THEY BOUGHT THREE VOTES
They Want a Fourth
This is public record. Here are the receipts.
THEY VOTED YES — and took money from the developer's lobbyist. Click Here For NUMBERS:
MIKE CLARK VOTED NO — and took $0:
Commissioner Mike Clark
$0
Commissioner Jeanne Herman
$0
Sources: ThisIsReno, “County commissioners reverse denial of Sierra Reflections tentative map,” March 12, 2026. News 4 / Fox 11, “Washoe commissioners approve controversial Sierra Reflections subdivision,” March 11, 2026. Contributions reported are from developer representative Ken Krater.
What Happened on March 10
The Washoe County Planning Commission denied Sierra Reflections 7–0 in January. The planning commission cited infrastructure concerns — water, fire, evacuation routes — that residents of Pleasant Valley and Washoe Valley had raised for nearly two decades.
But on March 10, the case came to the County Commission on appeal. The chambers were packed. Public comment ran more than three hours. Residents talked about wildfire evacuation routes choked by 940 new homes. About 4,000 existing wells that could see groundwater impacts. About mercury contamination from legacy mining on the site. About a master plan — Envision Washoe 2040 — that the project ignored.
Three commissioners voted to overturn the planning commission’s unanimous denial. Two voted to uphold it. The project was approved 3–2.
Eighteen hundred neighbors signed petitions against this project. Seven planning commissioners denied it. Three commissioners overruled them all.
Mike Clark Voted No
Mike Clark didn’t take the developer’s money. Mike Clark voted no. Mike Clark made the motion to reject the project.
It failed. But that’s not the point. The point is who Mike is when the chamber is packed and the cameras are on and the easy thing is to go along.
He’s the guy who asks the questions other commissioners won’t. He’s the guy who reads the staff reports and the master plans before he votes. He’s the guy who, on this commission, has earned a reputation for being almost annoyingly thorough with the questions he asks of entitled bureaucrats and recipients of taxpayer dollars.
That reputation is why he’s being targeted now.
Now They're BUYING Mike's Seat
So they’ve backed a primary challenger to run against Mike on June 9.
The Returns are Worth The Money
| CHALLENGER | $43,000+ reported cash on hand* |
| MIKE CLARK | $6,500 raised |
* Only $43,000 has been reported so far. There are estimates that campaign spending is more than $250,000.
Anyone watching this race can guess where the next big check is going to come from but we all know why they’re spending big to replace Mike Clark.
June 9 Is The Whole Ballgame
Which means the people who pushed Sierra Reflections through don’t have to win twice. They just have to win once — on June 9 — against a candidate they’re outspending seven to one, in a low-turnout primary where most Republicans don’t even realize an election is happening.
They are counting on you to sit this Primary out. Don’t give them the satisfaction!
Three Steps. That's It.
1
Watch your mailbox
2
Vote Mike Clark
3
Return it by June 9
Not sure if you’re registered, or whether you’re in District 2?